🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their seats.